Andrew wrote:
E. You send a _minimal_ patch ... prior
to going to Linus.
No! This isn't (for now at least) a fix. It's a nuke.
I don't want that "cpuset-change-marker-for-relative-numbering.patch"
going to Linus, because I am hesitating whether I even want that
"feature".
I want to nuke it now. You might see it again, fixed up, or you
might never see it again (I doubt you'll miss it ;). I don't
know yet.
Yes - the collisions resulting from removing this patch are easy to edit,
if that fits your style. If you hadn't removed the useless silly
zero initializers, I would have in my next set patches. It was on
my todo list, thanks to an earlier comment of yours.
So ... not E ;). What's your preference now?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]