On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:26:14PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > It seems very fragile (Wu's patches attempt to address that) in general: you > tweak it here and watch it go nuts there. The patch still has problems, and it can lead to more page allocations in remote nodes. For NUMA systems, basicly HPC applications want locality, and file servers want cache consistency. More worse two types of applications can coexist in one single system. The general solution may be classifying pages into two types: local pages: mostly local accessed, and low latency is first priority global pages: for consistent file caching Reclaims from global pages should be balanced globally to make a seamlessly single global cache. We can allocate special zones to hold the global pages, and make the reclaims from them in sync. Nick, are you working on this? Thanks, Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by Date: Linux 2.6.15-rc5: off-line for a week
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Index(es):