Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:06:50AM +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >>- it's more adapted for use in real-time environments
> >>
> >I still do not see why you are stating this.  Why do you say this?
> >
> Due to possible priority inversion problems in David's core.

I am still not convinced of your statements here, sorry.  Specifics
please.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
  - From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
  - From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] linux-2.6-block: deactivating pagecache for benchmarks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]