Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:06:50AM +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >>- it's more adapted for use in real-time environments
> >>
> >I still do not see why you are stating this.  Why do you say this?
> >
> Due to possible priority inversion problems in David's core.

I am still not convinced of your statements here, sorry.  Specifics
please.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
    • From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
    • From: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] linux-2.6-block: deactivating pagecache for benchmarks
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]