On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Ryan Richter wrote: > > OK, I guess I'll stick with 2.6.14.3 for now, plus your patch. Should I > keep Kai's st.c patch? There was some mention of other patches, are > those relevant? Most of that discussion went over my head... For the "Bad page state" premature freeing you were seeing, only my patch should be relevant. There are other patches in the works, yes, and we have good reasons for them; but don't worry about them for this. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- References:
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- From: Ryan Richter <ryan@tau.solarneutrino.net>
- Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] ip / ifconfig redesign
- Next by Date: Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- Next by thread: Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- Index(es):
![]() |