Re: [RFC] ip / ifconfig redesign

[Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>]

Al Boldi wrote:
> The current ip / ifconfig configuration is arcane and inflexible.  The reason 
> being, that they are based on design principles inherited from the last 
> century.
>
> In a GNU/OpenSource environment, OpenMinds should not inhibit themselves 
> achieving new design-goals to enable a flexible non-redundant configuration.
>
> Specifically, '#> ip addr ' exhibits this issue clearly, by requiring to 
> associate the address to a link instead of the other way around.
>
> Consider this new approach for better address management:
> 1. Allow the definition of an address pool
> 2. Relate links to addresses
> 3. Implement to make things backward-compatible.
>
> The obvious benefit here, would be the transparent ability for apps to bind 
> to addresses, regardless of the link existence.
>
> Another benefit includes the ability to scale the link level transparently, 
> regardless of the application bind state.

Can you do this with the current code by using scripts/whatever to move
virtual IPs around the interfaces?

I guess I don't really understand what you are proposing...

Ben

> And there may be many other benefits... (i.e. 100% OSI compliance)
>
> --
> Al
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/