Wu Fengguang <[email protected]> wrote: > > First we run into a large range of pinned chunks, which lowered the scan > priority. And then there are plenty of reclaimable chunks, bomb... It doesn't have to be that complex - the unreclaimable pages could be referenced, or under writeback or even simply dirty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild fixes
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Index(es):
 |