Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Could be. But what about the bug which I think is there? That'll cause > > overscanning of the DMA zone. > > There were about 12Mb of inactive pages on the DMA zone. You're hypothesis > was that there were no LRU pages to be scanned on DMA zone? No, my hypothesis was that balance_pgdat() had a bug. Looking at it again, I don't see it any more.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 8/13] Time: i386 Conversion - part 4: ACPI PM variable renaming
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] Variable stopmachine_state should be volatile
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by thread: [PATCH 01/12] vm: kswapd incmin
- Index(es):
 |