On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:27:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > min_free_kbytes? This number really isn't anything to do with balancing > and more to do with the amount of reserve kept for things like GFP_ATOMIC > and recursive allocations. Let's not lower it ;) Agreed. Or at the very least that should be discussed in a separate thread, it has no relation with shrink_cache changes or anything else related to zone aging IMHO. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- Prev by Date: Re: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Index(es):
 |