On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:04:07AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > btw, maybe it's time to lower the low_mem_reserve. > There should be no need to keep ~50M free memory with the balancing patch. low_mem_reserve is indipendent from shrink_cache, because shrink_cache can't free unfreeable pinned memory. If you want to remove low_mem_reserve you'd better start by adding migration of memory across the zones with pte updates etc... That would at least mitigate the effect of anonymous memory w/o swap. But low_mem_reserve is still needed for all other kind of allocations like kmalloc or pci_alloc_consistent (i.e. not relocatable) etc... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/12] Balancing the scan rate of major caches
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Index(es):
 |