Re: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode

• To: Bharath Ramesh <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
• From: Keith Mannthey <[email protected]>
• Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:27:40 -0800
• Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Hslt63mZT7t9gNNl0K4EWGIezklwucflWm1H7y85a3VUwRq6RolHB5Wv4GUS8m5nSMnfnigvoEjgBxqoYGANKuJH3OSaP6QuA2MNeGW/HL16wx3xclYnO6vO++NYSqrfEcS1tKZwPcDwBMjvHy0zr+0y8Cx464y/wPtg62uaqDo=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]

Looks like something odd is going on with your processor apic id's.

Lines like
Processor #20 INVALID. (Max ID: 256)
are bad...

Could you try the following patch with i386?  It seems suspect to me
and could help identify the problem.

Your box has high processor apic ids and looks to be in flat apic mode
(versus clustered).  I think the code is assuming the box is in
clustered apic mode?

Thanks,
Keith

Attachment: apicid.fix
Description: Binary data

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
    • From: Bharath Ramesh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
    • From: Bharath Ramesh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc3(-mm1) 3/3] pci.h:
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc4
• Previous by thread: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
• Next by thread: Re: Only one processor detected in 8-Way opteron in 32-bit mode
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]