Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:55:49 -0500

> Whether or not the count should even exist in the first place
> is still a question for examination -- nothing appears to use it.

I think it should be killed, in all of my Linux kernel
hacking I've never seen a user of this return value. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux