RE: Add VT flag to cpuinfo; SSE3 flag

>As I said, we discussed this internally and the concensus was that
>`vmx' was correct.  Especially since this term is used in the
>documentation this should be safe.

If not, I would propose to prefix or postfix the cpuflag somehow, maybe 
coupled with the arch or creator like 'ivmx' (intel vmx) and 'pvmx' (ppc 
vmx).

Oh BTW, I am missing an 'sse3' flag in /proc/cpuinfo on Opterons (running 
2.6.13). Could this be added, if it has not yet in 2.6.15rc*?


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Add VT flag to cpuinfo; SSE3 flag
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
    • From: "Dugger, Donald D" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: swsusp intermittent failures in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
• Next by Date: Re: discrepency between "df" and "du" on tmpfs filesystem?
• Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
• Next by thread: Re: Add VT flag to cpuinfo; SSE3 flag
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]