Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mark Lord wrote:
> 
> On a related note, WHY does the LOG LEVEL format <6> not get
> interpreted correctly for the first printk() after an oops report?

It never gets interpreted except at the behinning of a line. Sounds like 
the oops report perhaps prints a " " without a newline or something at the 
end, so that the next message after that isn't a new line?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux