Probably I should have mentioned, how my benchmark should look like:
I have written a little c-program opening several files for reading and
writing.
The dentry-cache would only play a role the first time, the files are
opened. I'm not quite sure about the inode-cache.
I check if the page has buffer, and mark them as not uptodate, too. So
the buffer-cache is disabled, too.
I'm using ext2/ext3. I don't think, they use any additional caches.
But anyway: Could you explain your fake-umount idea a little more ?
Am Donnerstag, den 01.12.2005, 14:29 +0100 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 14:17 +0100, Dirk Henning Gerdes wrote:
> > Hi Jens!
> >
> > For doing benchmarks on the I/O-Schedulers, I thought it would be very
> > useful to disable the pagecache.
>
>
> for benchmarks this is not enough though, you also need to clean the
> inode and dentry caches, as well as any filesystem specific caches
> (might be buffer cache).....
> at which point it's probably nicer to just fake a limited umount since
> that has to do all of that anyway
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Dirk Henning Gerdes
Bönnersdyk 47
47803 Krefeld
Tel: 02151-755745
0174-7776640
Mail: [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
