On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:33:47PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 November 2005 17:15, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > > Emulated scsi hosts don't do DMA, so don't unnecessarily increase
> > > the SCSI DMA pool.
> >
> > They don't? Recently I learned(?) that apparently using hdparm -d on the
> > old /dev/hdX device still worked/applied when using ide-scsi... or do
> > "emulated scsi hosts" refer to something else?
>
> Actually by 'do DMA' I meant use the scsi_malloc() interface - which
> is mostly used by low level drivers. The IDE drivers allocate their
> DMA memory outside the SCSI layer. iSCSI hosts for instance, don't
> need to cause unnecessary DMA allocations.
(1) there's no guranteee a driver setting ->emulated can't use scsi_malloc
(2) 2.4.x is very late in the cycle so there's just no point in putting this
in (and in 2.6.x scsi_malloc is gone fortunately)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
