Andi-
Good guess. We discuessed it and decided that `vmx' was the best
term so I'll rework the patch to use that name.
BTW, I don't see any reference to `vmx' in the 2.6.14 tree, is
this a change you recently made to your tree?
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
[email protected]
Ph: (303)440-1368
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen
>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:53 PM
>To: Dugger, Donald D
>Cc: [email protected]; Shah, Rajesh; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo
>
>[email protected] (Donald D Dugger) writes:
>
>> Andrew-
>>
>> Attached is a trivial patch to 2.6 that will add `vt' to the
>flags field
>> of `/proc/cpuinfo' for CPUs that have Intel's virtualization
>technology.
>
>The x86-64 tree already has "vmx" for it. What is the correct
>name?
>
>-Andi
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to [email protected]
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
