Christoph,
During that function calls 3 memory ridings are performed under
spin_lock and having cache miss/conflict problem;
and 2 only main memory ridings after patching.
In a source a[b][c][d](arg);
after patching number of memory ridings less by 1:
a[c][d](arg);
Do you agree with it?
Have you other explanation of performance degradation 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10?
Leonid
-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:26 PM
To: Ananiev, Leonid I
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] elevator: indirect function calls reducing
this _still_ isn't an indirect function call reduction and people
have told you N times. Please get your basics right first, to start
with the patch description.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
