2005/11/30, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>: > > OK, Remove your patches, run the system where you can capture the log, > and provide a full output of the oops. Make sure you have > CONFIG_KALLSYMS set. > OK, attached an oops from netconsole. TIA, Grzegorz Nosek
Attachment:
oops.s35
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- References:
- [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Grzegorz Nosek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] race condition in procfs
- Index(es):