Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ryan Richter wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:48:22PM +0200, Kai Makisara wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ryan Richter wrote:
> > > This applies cleanly to 2.6.14.2, do you forsee any problems using it
> > > with that kernel?  I'd like to not change too many things at once.
> > > 
> > No, I don't see any potential problems applying this patch to 2.6.14.2. 
> > There is nothing specific to 2.6.15-rc2.
> > 
> > If someone sees that there is something wrong, please yell. The 
> > main purpose of the patch is not to call release_buffering() at the end of 
> > st_write() when starting asynchronous write and call it in 
> > write_behind_check() instead.
> 
> OK, thanks.  I think I'll go ahead and advance to 2.6.14.3 since that
> should theoretically not cause any problems.
> 
> One question: do you think the oopses that happened later that actually
> crashed the box were from damage caused by this bug or is that a
> different problem?
> 
I looked at the oopses but, not knowing enough about what is happening 
inside the kernel, I can only hope that they are caused by the st bug(s). 
We will see after testing with the patch.

-- 
Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux