Hi
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:17 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Well, as Pekka Enberg also pointed out, Documentation/CodingStyle says
that's not the prefered way. But, it's your code, so if you don't like
the cleanups don't apply them.
i still think the patch is a good idea and makes the file more
readable though.
I think: if you are going to hack the hpfs code and coding style patches
will improve your experience, apply them and push them into mainstream
kernel. Otherwise don't --- they wouldn't help anybody and they would make
patch merging between 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 version of this driver (yes
--- I keep all these synchronised) harder.
Mikulas
I also think the patches are a good idea but it is up to the maintainer,
of course.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
