On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:19:31AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > And in practice the CPU will run so hot that only benchmarkers like it. > > > > Why would it run hot? What's the difference between polling and doing > > other things. How many transistors does it take to poll? > > It will prevent the CPU from going into sleep states and essentially > keep most of it enabled. Well, there's one thing that my patch _does_ help with. (And it has just helped me now). If you boot up with idle=poll and forget about it, you can check what idle routine is being used and switch out of poll without rebooting. (like I'm doing right now :-) -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.14-rt13
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching to idle_poll (was: Re: 2.6.14-rt13)
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching to idle_poll (was: Re: 2.6.14-rt13)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rt13
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *7)
- Next by Date: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
- Index(es):