Re: [patch] SMP alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

In contrast, the simple silicon support scales wonderfully well. Suddenly libraries can be thread-safe _and_ efficient on UP too. You get to eat your cake and have it too.


By buying new hardware and only caring about people using the magic
architecture.  No thanks.

That is the problem, waiting for Intel to do hardware magic, or even to decide IF they do it. Like assuming that everyone has SMP because a few percent of the users have dual core chips. The majority of the markey will have SMP someday, but ignoring the current status isn't realistic.

Maybe I'll implement this some weekend.

Love to see it, I'm only semi-convinced it can be done in a way which actually produces significant benefits.


--
   -bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux