On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:46:43AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > I got a problem report on the handling of large (2.4GB) files
> > with isofs, where 2.6 was fine and 2.4 failed. Replied
> >
> > >I suspect that the difference between 2.4 and 2.6 is the assignment
> > > s->s_maxbytes = 0xffffffff;
> > >in isofs/inode.c. Could you try to add that after
> > > s->s_magic = ISOFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
> > >in the 2.4 source?
> >
> > and got the confirmation that that solves the problems.
> > Maybe one should consider adding this in 2.4.
>
> I can't spot any issues with files upto 4GB.
> Who was the reporter?
Giulio Orsero <giulioo \x40 pobox \x2e com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
