Re: [RT] read_tsc: ACK! TSC went backward! Unsynced TSCs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 09:30 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > The kernel's use of TSC is wholly incorrect.  TSCs can ramp up and
> > down and *do* vary between nodes as well as between cores within a
> > node.  You really can not compare TSCs between cpu cores at all, as is
> > (and the kernel assumes 1 global TSC in at least a few places). 
> 
> That's one way to look at it; another is that the AMD dual cores have a
> broken TSC implementation.  The kernel's use of the TSC was never a
> problem in the past...

Sure.  But the OS can be fixed, the chips can not.  That said, I'd like to
see a spec that says TSCs are a) synced, b) linear.  If such a beast
exists, then we can all mock AMD publicly.  If not, we should hush up and
fix the parts that can be fixed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux