> It looks like the obviously correct fix is to only call > machine_shutdown when pm_power_off is defined. Doing > that will make Andi's assumption about not scheduling > true and generally simplify what must be supported. Looks like a reasonable fix. Thanks. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
- Next by Date: Re: psmouse unusable in -mm series (was: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 unsusable on DELL Inspiron 8200, 2.6.15-rc1 works fine)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- Index(es):
 |