On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:47:38AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:36:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > The Coverity checker spotted this obvious NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Hi Adrian,
>
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> > Could you explain why you remove the adpt_post_wait_lock acquision?
> >
> > And if it does not belong there, why don't you remove it instead of
> > commeting out?
> >...
>
> my patch does remove the following not required line:
>
> > > - p2 = NULL;
>
> It does not touch the following line that was already commented out:
>
> > > // spin_lock_irqsave(&adpt_post_wait_lock, flags);
> >...
Doh. I should _read_ the patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
