Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain

>   - Introduce a new notifier API which is wholly unlocked

The old notifiers were already wholly unlocked. So it wouldn't 
even need any changes. Just additional locks everywhere.

I agree it's the cleaner implementation.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
  - From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
  - From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.15-rc2-mm1] Disabled flatmem on ppc32? (ARCH=powerpc)
Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]