On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:47, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:50:49 +0000 (GMT),
> > Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The 'G' seems to confuse a hell of a lot of people.
> > >> (I've been asked about it when people got machine checks a lot over
> > >> the last few months).
> > >>
> > >> Would anyone object to changing it to conform to the style of
> > >> the other taint flags ? Ie, change it to ' ' ?
> > >
> > >Please, please do: it's insane as is. But I've CC'ed Keith,
> > >we sometimes find the kernel does things so to suit ksymoops.
> >
> > 'G' is not one of mine, I find it annoying as well.
>
> Would anyone object to changing it so that tainted only means Proprietary
> taint and use a different keyword for GPL tainting such as "Corrupted"?
I don't see the point. The system is in a dubious state, tainted is
the word we've been using for that, the flags indicate what's suspect,
why play with the wording further? But replace 'G' by ' ' certainly.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
