Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Thursday 24 November 2005 14:52, Nick Hengeveld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:37:15AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I just repacked and updated it now, so how http should work too, although
inefficiently (because it will get a whole new pack - just one of the
disadvantages of the non-native protocols).
There's room to improve on that particular inefficiency. The http
commit walker could use Range: headers to fetch loose objects directly
from inside a pack if it didn't make sense to fetch the entire pack.
For this to work, pack fetches would need to be deferred until the
entire tree had been walked, and the commit walker could decide whether
to fetch the pack or loose objects based on the percentage of packed
objects it needed to fetch. It would also need to fetch all
tag/commit/tree objects using ranges to be able to fully walk the tree.
Alternately, when creating a new archive the client could ask the server
what protocols are active. It could then use the best one for the clone and
update the .git/origin files with the optimal one for incremental pulls.
This would only work with the git protocol, and since that's the fastest
protocol (theoretically that is, Pasky seems to have gotten other
figures but I'm not sure I believe those) it should really only ever
return itself which wouldn't make much sense.
--
Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]