Re: PI BUG with -rt13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:57:34PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * david singleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Sure.  Attached is the locking fix patch. [...]
> 
> thanks, applied - it should show up in -rt15.
> 

I just noticed with the above fix, Paul's testcase completely
hangs up and when killed I hit the BUG mentioned below.
Till -rt13, this testcase just ran to completion

check_monotonic_clock: monotonic inconsistency detected!
        from       52d314a423 (355728663587) to       50a53da892 (346369665170).
pthread_cond_ma/6345[CPU#2]: BUG in check_monotonic_clock at kernel/time/timeofday.c:156
 [<c011a840>] __WARN_ON+0x60/0x80 (8)
 [<c0139972>] check_monotonic_clock+0xcc/0x109 (48)
 [<c0139dfe>] get_monotonic_clock+0x110/0x146 (68)
 [<c013100c>] ktimer_interrupt+0x54/0x2f6 (92)
 [<c010163c>] __switch_to+0x2a/0x248 (12)
 [<c037d82b>] __schedule+0x41b/0xab7 (40)
 [<c013b86e>] add_preempt_count_ti+0x1e/0xc6 (20)
 [<c013b86e>] add_preempt_count_ti+0x1e/0xc6 (8)
 [<c01393e4>] handle_nextevent_update+0xd/0x23 (20)
 [<c010caaa>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5c/0x65 (12)
 [<c01037a4>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x1c/0x24 (12)
 [<c037f39f>] __down_mutex+0x69f/0x7fd (44)
 [<c0122856>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33 (24)
 [<c0122856>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33 (76)
 [<c0122856>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33 (20)
 [<c03815fd>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x46 (12)
 [<c0122856>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33 (8)
 [<c0122856>] lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33 (16)
 [<c01228a8>] __mod_timer+0x38/0xdf (16)
 [<c037e86e>] schedule_timeout+0x4f/0xa2 (32)
 [<c0123773>] process_timeout+0x0/0x9 (32)
 [<c013c95d>] futex_wait+0x225/0x2b5 (24)
 [<c012e332>] add_wait_queue+0x12/0x30 (80)
 [<c013b9cb>] sub_preempt_count+0x1a/0x1e (20)
 [<c0381c34>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x12/0x2c (44)
 [<c037db39>] __schedule+0x729/0xab7 (8)
 [<c0114b4d>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x22 (12)
 [<c0114b4d>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x22 (32)
 [<c013d84f>] do_futex+0xf3/0xf8 (40)
 [<c013d949>] sys_futex+0xf5/0x101 (40)
 [<c013d951>] sys_futex+0xfd/0x101 (36)
 [<c0102ce7>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75 (24)
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00010001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<c013b930>] .... add_preempt_count+0x1a/0x1e
.....[<00000000>] ..   ( <= stext+0x3feffd68/0x8)

------------------------------
| showing all locks held by: |  (pthread_cond_ma/6345 [f2a52120,   0]):
------------------------------

#001:             [c3888fe0] {&base->t_base.lock}
... acquired at:               lock_timer_base+0x19/0x33


I have attached the testcase below. Run it as

gcc -g  -lpthread  pthread_cond_many.c   -o pthread_cond_many
sh ./pthread_cond_many.sh --realtime


	-Dinakar

Attachment: rt-pthread.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux