Re: Performance degradation when using partitions

[Daniel Nilsson <daniel.n.nilsson@home.se>]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:48:41AM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> >While setting up a software RAID-5 array I started looking into the
> >performance aspect of using partioned drives versus the whole disks
> >for a RAID-5 array. I have an Adaptec 2400a controller which through
> >the I2O kernel driver gives me access to 4x 250GB disks (JBOD mode).
> 
> Did you get an answer on this? And does it happen if you use the drives 
> directly, /dev/hdN or /dev/sdN instead of using I2O? I didn't see an 
> obvious speed penalty in raw access of drives vs. partitions, but I 
> lacked the hardware to really match your setup, particularly the I2O use 
> vs. direct access to /dev/sd[ef].

Bill,

No, I didn't get an answer on this. I've done some more experiments
with the drives, but since they are connected to an Adaptec 2400A RAID
controller (in JBOD mode) I need to go through some I2O driver in or
to see the drives at all. So I never have direct access to these
drives as /dev/hdN or /dev/sdN. There are however two different
drivers available for this RAID controller, one is the standard I2O
driver and the other one is the Adaptec dpt_i2o driver.

The results are the same though whether I use the Linux I2O driver or
the Adaptec dpt_i2o, the software raid array is rebuilding at roughly
half the speed when the drives are partioned. I don't know what other
data to provide in ordet to get any further in the testing.

Thanks
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/