Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support

Alan Cox wrote:

Additionally, current IOAT is memory->memory. I would love to be able to convince Intel to add transforms and checksums,

Not just transforms but also masks and maybe even merges and textures
would be rather handy 8)

Ah yes:  I totally forgot to mention XOR.

Software RAID would love that.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
    • From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
    • From: Andrew Grover <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: rfc/rft: use r10 as current on x86-64
• Next by Date: Re: [git pull 09/14] Uinput: add UI_SET_SWBIT ioctl
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]