On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:46:27PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >The idea was to turn LOCK on only if the process has any > >shared writable mapping and num_online_cpus() > 0. > > Yep. Though I presume you mean "> 1". Yeah, > 1 of course. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Index(es):
 |