> CPU insert/remove is performed how many times a second ? Or for that > matter why not just reload the PAT register and keep the index the > same ? you also want this for single threaded apps, so that the glibc locking stuff can not do lock for single-threaded apps and non-shared memory - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] SMP alternatives
- From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@suse.de>
- [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- [RFC] SMP alternatives
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Index(es):
 |