On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 13:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Rohit Seth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think Martin was able to demonstrate much benefit from the lock
> > > contention reduction on 16-way NUMAQ either.
> > >
> > > So I dithered for months and it was a marginal merge, so it's appropriate
> > > to justify the continued presence of the code.
> > >
> >
> > May be the limits on the number of pages hanging on the per_cpu_pagelist
> > was (or even now is) too small (for them to give any meaningful gain).
> > May be we should have more physical contiguity in each of these pcps to
> > give better cache spread.
>
> Could be. The initial settings were pretty arbitrary - I assumed that
> someone would get in and tune them up, but nothing much happened. Perhaps
> we should expose the thresholds in /proc/sys/vm so they're easier to play
> with.
Most certainly. If I had a patch ready...I would have given you one
right away :-) Though I will work on it...
It surely is unfortunate that we have not digged deeper into this area
(in terms of optimizations)....
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
