Hi!
> > I'd like to see it applied...
>
> This diff looks much neater than the last one and I agree with the
> principle of it. I don't think its the right time to apply it for two
> reasons:
>
> 1. We probably shouldn't (can't?) make changes like this in -rc
> kernels
No, it does not really belong in -rc. I was hoping you would merge it
in your tree so I do not have big patch here and could keep only
collie changes...
> I have a proposal for how we proceed with this:
>
> After 2.6.15 is released, I envisage a patch which splits the common
> sections of sharpsl_pm.c into arm/common and arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl.h into
> include/arm/hardware/sharpsl_pm.h. I'm happy to generate that patch if
> necessary and pass it to Russell. I'll try and create a patch to show
> the structure I'm aiming for in the next couple of days but at the
> moment we don't know exactly which code is common and I'd prefer to try
> and do the split in one go.
Ok, works for me. So I'll now concentrate on getting collie working
and leave infrastructure to you...
> I did note your patch adds a copyright header to a file you're mostly
> deleting code from?
I actually did add some collie parts into it, and then deleted
everything #ifdef collie from that. Sorry.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
