On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:16:37PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > It means that we spun in the serial interrupt for more than 256 times
> > and reached the limit on the amount of work we were prepared to do.
> > Any idea what you were doing when these happened?
>
> Because ACPI was right and the second serial port isn't there?
Well, it certainly looked like a serial port when it was probed - to the
extent that even loopback mode worked. Hence I'd be very surprised if
it wasn't there.
It's the same test that's being applied as has been for the last 14
years to detect if a port is present or not. Maybe Ted T'so would
be aware if it can optimistically discover ports?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
