Hi,
On Tuesday, 22 of November 2005 23:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Well, I do not think this problem will surface again. It is first
> > > failure in pretty long time. If it happens again, I'll take your
> > > patch.
> >
> > If so, could you please make it printk() a message after the timeout has
> > passed? This way the user will know what's going on at least.
>
> We do have messages there, they even tell you name of process that was
> not stopped. That's enough to debug failure quickly.
The problem is that currently the messages are only printed after the timeout,
so if you puch the timeout to infinity, they won't get printed at all.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
