On 11/22/05, Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/22/05, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > If a clueless users voice counts for anything: I couldn't agree more.
> > > > >
> > > > > A failed resume is a near catastrophy if you use and trust swsusp. And
> > > > > how could it ever be useful if you don't?
> > > >
> > > > Failed resume is only as bad as powerfail.
> > >
> > > So? I don't like powerfails either. Could you please answer this
> > > question - what pros of having resume process time out do you
> > > envision? What problems does it help to solve?
> >
> > No advantages, really.. except that it keeps suspend and resume paths
> > similar, and keeps the code simple. I'll want to call this from
> > userland and I'd hate to have two different calls or call with
> > parameter.
> >
>
> Passing a parameter from userspace - is it so hard? Oh well, if you
> prefer to leave this as a time bomb ready to explode - so be it.
>
I think my words were a tad too strong. I apologize.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
