Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:19:06AM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Add a default definition of NO_IRQ to <linux/hardirq.h> and make the
> definition in <asm/hardirq.h> uniform across all architectures which
> define it.

Please put the definition into <asm/irq.h> and <linux/interrupt.h>,
hardirq.h is rather misnamed and about the internal irq/softirq/preempt
mask mechanisms.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
  - From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
  - From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: today's graphics (was Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch)
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]