Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:19:06AM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Add a default definition of NO_IRQ to <linux/hardirq.h> and make the
> definition in <asm/hardirq.h> uniform across all architectures which
> define it.

Please put the definition into <asm/irq.h> and <linux/interrupt.h>,
hardirq.h is rather misnamed and about the internal irq/softirq/preempt
mask mechanisms.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: today's graphics (was Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Ensure NO_IRQ is appropriately defined on all architectures
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]