Re: 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related

On 11/22/05, Geoff Mishkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alright, I can do that.  What about cisco_ipsec and fglrx?  cisco_ipsec I
> could live without, but fglrx would be difficult.  I've never been able to
> get the radeon driver working on my system, at all.

Please reproduce it without any binary-only drivers loaded.

                          Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related
    • From: Geoff Mishkin <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related
    • From: Geoff Mishkin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related
• Next by Date: Re: Thread group exec race -> null pointer... HELP
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.14.2 kernel oops, looks acpi-related
• Next by thread: [PATCH -mm2] net: Fix compiler-error on atyfb_base.c when !CONFIG_PCI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]