On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > All of that said, I am not even sure we have a bit left in the page > > flags on smaller architectures :/. > > How about > > #define PG_checked 8 /* kill me in 2.5.<early>. */ > > ? > > At least PG_uncached isn't used on many architectures too, so could > be reused. I don't know why those that use it don't check VMAs instead. > PG_unchecked appears to be totally unused. It's only users are the macros that manipulate the bit and mm/page_alloc.c . It appears it has been a long time since it was used to it is a canditate for reuse. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20
- Prev by Date: Re: Please help me understand ->writepage. Was Re: segfault mdadm --write-behind, 2.6.14-mm2 (was: Re: RAID1 ramdisk patch)
- Next by Date: Re: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
- Index(es):