Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, if we just cleaned up the top 10 offenders we'd get rid of 6281 > out of the total 14491 warnings. Yes, that's sane - it'll help make the warning output more manageable. I think the i386/bitops.h one is fixed in -mm. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/3] Add SCM info to MAINTAINERS
- Next by Date: Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
- Next by thread: [PATCH -mm2] net: Fix compiler-error on dgrs.c when !CONFIG_PCI
- Index(es):
 |