At Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:25:58 +0000,
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Now another question arises: Which is the recommended method for
> > mmapping RAM pages, vma nopage callback or remap_pfn_range()?
> >
> > IIRC, in the ealier versions, the former was recommended because
> > remap_page_range() with page-reserve was regarded as a hack.
> > But, looking through these changes, I feel that remap_pfn_range() is
> > better (easier and stabler) than vma nopage...
>
> And this brings up the question of this age old patch:
>
> diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' -r orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c
> --- orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c Mon Apr 4 22:52:57 2005
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c Mon Apr 4 22:44:45 2005
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
> ret = (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, order);
>
> if (ret != NULL) {
> - memset(ret, 0, size);
> + memset(ret, 0, PAGE_ALIGN(size));
> *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret);
> }
> return ret;
> diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' -r orig/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h linux/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h
> --- orig/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h Mon Apr 4 22:54:41 2005
> +++ linux/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h Mon Apr 4 22:48:11 2005
> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
> void dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle);
>
> +static inline int
> +dma_mmap_coherent(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + void *vaddr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size)
> +{
> + unsigned long offset = vma->vm_pgoff, usize;
> +
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + usize = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (offset >= size || usize > (size - offset))
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + return remap_page_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
> + __pa(vaddr) + (offset << PAGE_SHIFT),
> + usize << PAGE_SHIFT, vma->vm_page_prot);
> +}
> +
> static inline dma_addr_t
> dma_map_single(struct device *dev, void *ptr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
>
> which provides the dma mmap API which presently is ARM-only on to x86.
Yes, that's nice. It would be nice if dma_mmap_coherent() is
implemented on all architectures.
> Note: the first part of this patch should probably be applied anyway
> if you're mmaping dma_alloc_coherent pages to userspace to ensure that
> information is not leaked from kernel context.
This reminds me another thing: x86 dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't trim
the pages between PAGE_ALIGN(size) and (1 << order). Some archs seem
doing this right.
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]