Re: nanosleep with small value

> Dag Nygren wrote:
> > But what is the point of having a nanosleep() in that case when you could do
> > just fine with usleep() ?
> 
> I'd suggest looking into the kthrt patches (which incorporates ktimers
> and John Stultz's timeofday patches):  http://www.tglx.de/projects/ktimers/

Thanks for that tip. This completely solved my problem; The program works 
again.

There seems to be two "competing" patches out there, but this seems to be the 
way
to go as the kernel bunch is behind it.

Best

Dag

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: nanosleep with small value
    • From: Frank Sorenson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 -- Bad page state at free_hot_cold_page (in process 'aplay', page c18eef30)
• Next by Date: [patch 2.6.15-rc2] blk: request poisoning
• Previous by thread: Re: nanosleep with small value
• Next by thread: Re: nanosleep with small value
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]