On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:48:10AM +0100, Markus Lidel wrote: > Yep, you're right... the memcpy_fromio is wrong... It should be: > > memcpy_fromio(&evt->body[1], &msg->body[1], size * 4); > > as you already mentioned... BTW, should that be memcpy() or memcpy_fromio()? IOW, what memory does msg point to? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Markus Lidel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Markus Lidel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- From: Markus Lidel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/5] Don't overflow irq_desc array
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.15-rc1, soft lockup detected while probing IDE devices on AMD7441
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] I2O: SPARC fixes
- Index(es):