On 11/20/05, Bodo Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Daniel Marjamäki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > - aztTimeOutCount = 0;
> > + aztTimeOut = jiffies + 2;
>
> Different timeout based on HZ seems wrong.
True; I'm trying to think of a good way to emulate 8000000 iterations
of loop, though. Really, this is not terrible to use 2 jiffies of
offset, as we try to sleep 1 jiffy each time. As long as we don't get
a signal *right* away, we'll sleep probably for 2 loops. Not sure,
though, may be useful to see what happens in practice and then debug
further for the right value.
May also want to use time_after_eq() not time_after().
Thanks,
Nish
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
