On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:03:48PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:16:22PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> >
> > Here's the latest version of the dma_ops patch. The patch is against
> > Linus's tree as of yesterday and applies cleanly to
> > 2.6.15-rc1-git5. Tested on AMD64 and Intel EM64 (x366) with gart,
> > swiotlb, nommu and iommu=off. Please apply...
>
> Any chance you could move struct dma_mapping_ops to generic code and
> implement the dma_ operations ontop of them in linux/dma-mapping.h if
> the arch sets a WANT_DMA_MAPPING_OPS symbol? This kind of switch is
> duplicated in far too many architectures.
I'm looking at this now. PPC, IA64 and parisc have something like
this, as well as x86-64 with my patch applied. The others either have
dma_ops with completely different semantics or choose the dma ops
implementation at compile time. However, each arch needs a slightly
different definition of dma_mapping_ops - I'm not sure having one
definition catering to all archs is better than what we have now,
considering the DMA mapping implementation is inherently arch
specific.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
