Re: [PATCH] NUMA policies in the slab allocator V2

On Friday 18 November 2005 02:51, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This patch fixes a regression in 2.6.14 against 2.6.13 that causes an
> imbalance in memory allocation during bootup.

I still think it's wrongly implemented. We shouldn't be slowing down the slab 
fast path for this. Also BTW if anything your check would need to be 
dependent on !in_interrupt(), otherwise the policy of slab allocations
in interrupt context will change randomly based on what the current
process is doing (that's wrong, interrupts should be always local)
But of course that would make the fast path even slower ...

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] NUMA policies in the slab allocator V2
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] NUMA policies in the slab allocator V2
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] NUMA policies in the slab allocator V2
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] NUMA policies in the slab allocator V2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]