Bill Davidsen wrote: > process matters as much as a beer fart in a cow barn. This one cracked me up :-) > It seems like a lot of effort is being spent making things run in 4k > stacks, with minimal consideration of what benefits are gained or if > there are other ways to gain them. It just feels as though it's being > done to prove it's possible. Linux is about choice, let's go back to that. I couldn't agree more. Giri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: "Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:18:51 +0100" <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Giridhar Pemmasani <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Prev by Date: monitoring disk access
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Index(es):
 |